Cratus Brand Stamp
We're more than an agency. We're change makers.

One Summer in Somerset


By Helen Tilton, Associate

MHCLG has been busy issuing significant information this week, in something of a pre-Summer recess flurry on the planning and Local Government front.

Almost hidden amongst the changes to the NPPF and the National Model Design Code, and the consultation on the Arc, there is the confirmation that three local authorities areas will be restructured, as inferred by MP Luke Hall at MHCLG’s live oral questions on Monday. The written statement has now been made confirming that*:

  • A new North Yorkshire unitary council is set to be created after a proposal from North Yorkshire County Council for a single unitary on the footprint of the existing administrative county was successful. The new council is due to operate alongside the existing unitary City of York Council.
  • Cumbria County Council’s proposals were rejected, and an eastern unitary council will cover the existing areas of Barrow-in-Furness Borough Council and Eden and South Lakeland District Councils alongside a western unitary council covering the existing areas of Allerdale and Copeland Borough Councils and Carlisle City Council.
  • Somerset County Council will be reorganised into a single county unitary (“One Somerset”), spelling defeat for a bid by the four districts in the county for a two-unitary solution, Western Somerset and Eastern Somerset (“Stronger Somerset”).

Should we be in any way surprised by the “One Somerset” outcome? From a consultation and PR perspective, it has been an unfortunately messy exercise locally.

As well as the government’s consultation, an advisory poll was undertaken. If the poll was a deliberate exercise in attempting to evidence the guidance of the Secretary of State, which includes that proposals should “…command a good deal of local support as assessed in the round overall across the whole area of the proposal”, it could in theory have gone some way towards doing so. It’s no surprise though, that the principle of the poll was criticised by Robert Jenrick and by the County Council. It’s not hard to see why it could have been viewed as an attempt to frustrate and de-rail the government’s official consultation – and of course, a vote/poll and a consultation are two very different exercises.

Perhaps the poll would have carried more weight if it wasn’t for the ballot pack erroneously including a link to a spoof version of the official website, featuring doctored versions of the One Somerset campaign material. We may never know how much it influenced the poll outcome – the results returned at the start of June showed that of just over 111,100 valid votes (25.6% turnout), 65.3% voted for the District Councils’ “Stronger Somerset” proposal, meaning that nearly two-thirds of people who voted were in favour of the approach of forming form two unitary authorities.

A joint statement from the district councils suggests that the poll leaflet was drafted by an independent third party and that it had, in fact, been sent to be proofed. If nothing else is learned from these events, the fact that important information for local residents could be open to hijacking really does underline the importance of meticulous data management, scrutiny and fact-checking?

*All three proposals still require parliamentary approval. All the new unitary authorities are due to be formed from 2023, with elections for shadow councils taking place in May next year.

One Summer in Somerset