Last week, I was working with a developer on how they talk about a new scheme. They described it in a way that made perfect sense to their peers: “It’s a mixed-use development with strong Section 106 contributions, offset by sustainability measures, and an innovative approach to density through mid-rise podium blocks.”
I’m sorry… what?
If you’re an architect or planner, you know exactly what that means. If you live nearby and want to know how it affects your daily life, it probably won’t be that helpful. You want to know if it will bring new shops. More traffic? A nursery place for your child?
The way we frame messages is important. What feels obvious to professionals can sound like another language to the people who most need to understand it.
When I worked in the construction industry, there was a period when everyone was talking about the KISS principle: “Keep it Simple, Stupid”. It emerged from the engineering world in the 1960s and was intended as a reminder not to overcomplicate. The trouble is, people often got hung up on the word “stupid,” which meant they often missed the point.
Simplification is not about dumbing down; it’s about respect. Respect for people’s time, attention, and ability to grasp what matters if you give them a fair chance.
And while we’re here, a quick plea: let’s not fall into the trap of reverse-engineering acronyms like KISS. (Or “Backronyms” as I have heard them called!) They are usually a sign that things have become too complicated already.
Why simplification matters
Simplification means giving people clarity without forcing them to decode a puzzle. It’s the difference between:
“Our strategic objectives are designed to leverage cross-platform synergies in pursuit of scalable outcomes.”
and
“This is what we’re aiming for, and this is how we’ll measure success.”
The second version isn’t any less intelligent, but it is arguably more useful for people to understand and act on.
When simplification tips into ‘dumbing down’
Of course, it’s possible to go too far. Dumbing down happens when information is stripped of nuance until it loses accuracy or substance.
Imagine telling a community about that same development by saying only, “It will bring in people and money and make everything better.” On one level, that’s simple. But it’s not enough. People want to know: better how, better for whom, better compared to what? Without that, the message feels empty and patronising.
The same goes for any audience. A message can be short and sharp, but it needs to give people enough information to make informed choices and build trust.
How to find the balance
So how do you walk the line between clear and shallow?
Why it matters
When communication is simplified, it feels natural. It lands without friction. Residents hear about new plans and feel included rather than baffled. Stakeholders leave a briefing with confidence that they know what’s going on. Done well, simplification doesn’t draw attention to itself. It just works.
Dumbing down, on the other hand, erodes trust. It makes people feel underestimated, or worse, misled. Once that trust is gone, no amount of polished slides or glossy emails can bring it back.
A note on AI
It’s worth including a note about AI here. It can certainly help. It can be useful to scan a draft, highlight jargon, or suggest clearer alternatives. But remember: this only works if you’re crystal clear on your messaging in the first place: what you want to say, who you need to reach, and why it matters.
The takeaway
Simplification is about clarity. Dumbing down is about underestimating. The art lies in making things easy without making them empty. Done right, simplification respects your audience’s time, intelligence, and capacity to engage. It creates the kind of communication that doesn’t just get read, but gets remembered.
Because when people truly understand what you’re saying, they don’t just nod along. They connect, act, and carry the message forward.